Translate

Showing posts with label albuquerque. Show all posts
Showing posts with label albuquerque. Show all posts

Monday, October 28, 2013

NEW MEXICO - WHY MORE IS LESS

.
.
ALBUQUERQUE IS A POSTER CHILD
FOR BREAKING BAD
***
As New Mexico and Albuquerque have grown, so our national ranking
in various categories (and there are many)
 has changed, almost always for the worst. 
 This last June we finally kicked Mississippi
out of 50th place for "child welfare,"
 and proudly assumed the title.
The Absolute Worst State in America for Kids.
Boy, what a place.
.
We rank in the bottom 5, of 50 states, in so
 many categories, it's obscene.
We let Mississippi keep the highest teenage 
pregnancy rate, but we're hot on their trail in
a close second spot.  It makes you want to weep. 
And a lot of politicians, bankers, developers, and other misguided folks -
the hopelessly lost, the eternally clueless -
would have us GROW!  Let's have more, NOW!
Where are those Italiano folks with all the nice agua?
.
The idea is hideously stupid.  What drew people to New Mexico in
the first place is now quickly becoming a piece of the past.
We don't need to grow.  We need to get a handle on what's
happening here, and make a sincere effort to do something
about quality of life issues, and forget about more
subdivisions, convenience stores, malls and meth.
.
.
.
We need to get a handle on things before we
completely ruin this place.  Right in front
of us, it's quickly becoming what many
people would call a "shithole."
.
Grow?  Why, for more of this?
Tap the San Augustin aquifer,
so a bunch of developers, politicians, and
 foreign "investors"
can make mountains of cash?
And in the process,
 this dump can get bigger?
Are you nuts?
Wait a minute, are you on meth?
Oh....you just make it.  I see. 
So you're pro-growth. 
Well....of course.
What else would you be.
.
.
Yesterday four cops got shot in Albuquerque
when some maniac with an AK47 decided
to make war on law and order.
Some pathetic little fifteen year old
kid was going to court this morning,
the one who gunned down five family members
 this past winter.
Daddy was a preacher man.  Shot dead.
The boy said he was upset with his mom.
Shot dead.
Poor little tyke.
Too many nutsy video games I guess.
.
.
And the craziness is there,
 on every local news channel,
every morning, noon, and night.
It's just a question of degree - 
better? worse? the same?
It just goes on, and on, and....
It's no wonder that many people from
the rural areas of the state just stay home.
Inside.
It's bad out there.
Yeah, and now it's breaking bad
 just about everywhere in
The Land of Enchantment.
We're the "riskiest" state in the Union.
.
.
.
.
THE CRIME OF WHAT WE'RE DOING
TO OUR CHILDREN
.
FROM EYEWITNESS NEWS
KOB4
.
New Mexico last in child well-being ranks
.
Posted at: 06/24/2013 6:43 PM
By: Stuart Dyson, KOB Eyewitness News 4

“Thank God for Mississippi” is a phrase well-known to many New Mexicans. That state has historically been dead last on every important quality of life list – but not anymore. Mississippi has moved up to 49th on the national “Kids Count” list, while our state has dropped to 50th.
New Mexico now ranks as the worst state in the nation when it comes to the well-being of our children. The “Kids Count” data-book ranks our state at number fifty, with low scores for things like education, health, and economic security. True, New Mexico never has ranked above 40th, but 50th place really hurts.
.
It’s not that we’re doing so much worse than we did last year. It’s just that Mississippi has made giant strides in things like the rate of kids attending pre-school. In fact teachers and school administrators say early education is the key to overall improvement in academic performance. 62 percent of New Mexico kids don’t attend pre-school, one of the lowest rates in the country.
“When we receive our kids and we see what it is that they’re lacking, they’re already behind the 8-ball,” said teacher Sonya Romero. “It makes it harder for us as teachers to catch them up in such as limited amount of time and with such limited resources that we have.”
.
Joan Baker owns and operates “My Happy Place” pre-school in Edgewood.
“The amount I’m able to pay my teachers, for the most part they can go make more working at McDonald’s or Arby’s,” Baker said. “At Smith’s being a bagger they can make more money. I have a high turnover and it’s hard for the kids to connect and learn when that teacher is gone in a few months.”
“This state lags behind in early childhood education,” said Albuquerque school superintendent Winston Brooks. In kindergarten we’ve got kids who can read just ten sight words and we’ve got kids who can read a novel. I think we have to really do a much better job with that.”
New Mexico got worse in the last year with almost one third of the kids living in poverty and 43 percent now in single parent families.
.
In fact most of the categories where New Mexico improved are in education, and most where the state got worse are in economic well-being. This last place ranking is yet another defining snapshot of just how devastating the recession has been in our state.
.
.
.

The Most Dangerous States in America



.
You might think that going to California, Texas or New York exposes you to a lot of crime.
But in fact it was Tennessee that had the nation’s highest violent crime rate last year.
.
The FBI’s latest statewide statistics offer a snapshot of the underside of the 50 states: where violent crime is most likely to occur. According to the FBI, violent crime includes murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the states with the highest rates of violent crime in the country.
.
While violent crime rose just under 1% nationally in 2012, the trend for the past 20 years has been steady decline. Crime peaked in the late 1980s, fueled by the crack cocaine epidemic. Beginning in the early 1990s, crime began to decline. Although the exact cause remains unclear, experts have pointed to factors such as better policing, demographic changes, higher incarceration rates, a drop in cocaine use and the introduction of a variety of social programs.
In an interview with 24/7 Wall St., Urban Institute senior fellow John Roman pointed out that the crime decline has not been uniform. It has improved markedly in some large cities, like New York, Dallas and Washington, D.C. However, the decline has been less impressive in cities like Baltimore and Detroit, where economic and racial segregation limit the ability of the poor to move into the middle class.
.
The more the population is integrated, Roman explained, the greater the chances of sizable crime declines. Most crime is committed by people at the bottom of the economic totem pole, he said.
The apparent relationship between low income, low education and higher crime rates has been well documented, although identifying the cause and effect is still a matter of debate. It is clear, though, that these states for the most part match the national trend. Of the 10 states with the highest rates of violent crime, eight have lower rates of adults with bachelor’s degrees, and most of them had median income levels below the national figure in 2012.
.
To read the entire article, go here:
We've edited for brevity sake - obviously what concerns
us is the national ranking below.
.
4. New Mexico
 Violent crimes per 100,000: 559.1
 Poverty rate: 20.8%
 Pct. of population with bachelor’s degree or higher: 26.1%
 Property crimes per 100,000: 3,600.7 (4th highest)
For many Americans, New Mexico is Taos, Santa Fe and the big nuclear laboratory at Los Alamos. It is also a poor state. Its violent crime rate is the fourth worst in the country; its forcible rape rate is also fourth worst. It has among the highest rates of drug use in the country, which is known to encourage criminal activity. Its burglary rate is second worst. “We dare not pretend this does not have an effect on our economy or our overall quality of life,” former New Mexico legislator Dennis Kintigh wrote in the Albuquerque Journal earlier this year about the levels of violence in the state.
.
.
.
And here's an interesting fact:
.
ALBUQUERQUE (KRQE)
. 
 A former state representative,
 who's also a former FBI agent and police chief,
 says New Mexico isn't sending nearly enough
 of its violent criminals to prison.
.
Dennis Kintigh crunched the numbers.
He says New Mexico has more murders and
 violent crimes per capita than any other
state in the southwest.
.
New Mexico also sends fewer of those
 violent criminals to prison than any other state
 in the southwest.
.
Kintigh says that's a failure
of the judicial system.
.
See the entire article here:
.
.
From NEWMEXICOWATCHDOG.ORG
.

“Breaking Bad” actor complains about crime in ABQ; prepare for media explosion     

By Rob Nikolewski on April 11, 2012
.
Aaron Paul portrays one of main characters in the TV show
 “Breaking Bad,” which is set — and filmed — in Albuquerque.
In the past, Paul has said some nice things about the city but
 after becoming a crime victim for the second time, he took to 
Twitter yesterday (April 10) to vent:
.
. 
.
From TIME Ideas:
.

Breaking Bad Normalizes Meth, Argues Prosecutor

Share4
.
.
BREAKING BAD.
And they chose Albuquerque for the location.
Perfect.  It really is.  People not unlike people you meet
in the show are all over the place.
It's as though "Central Casting" got asked to
find the perfect "methhead" - but not a character,
A CITY!
An urban complex that embodies
the stupidity of the drug itself!
.
The politicians, city planners,
developers, lawyers, dealers, hustlers -
they're all part of the milieu here -
this dimwitted, short-sighted, fast buck,
head-up-your-ass approach to life.
All the bigger places, the cities in the region,
 have this disease.
But Albuquerque is by far the dumbest -
the true idiot child of the urban southwest.
And it affects the entire state, to one
degree or another.  It's contagious.
And these days, it can even be fatal.
.
.
.
.
.
In Albuquerque,
there used to be certain zones where you find stuff,
and there still are, generally.
However, those lines are changing, boundaries
are expanding. 
 And it ain't just meth, and it sure as hell
isn't limited to "bad" areas of town.
Oxy and Cocaine roll downhill from the Sandia Foothills
to the adobe palaces of the North Valley
 and Corrales.
But there they're connected and seemingly protected. 
 The well-to-do.  Los patrones.
.
Yet there's no actual safe or untouched zones, not any longer.
Just neighborhoods that like to think they are.
Gated places.  Rent-a-cops.  Guns.  More guns.
.
"Our kids don't do drugs."
Well, maybe some of yours don't lady, but one hell
of a lot of people here DO, including a lot of kids.
The drugstore is open...all over town.
Pot's blase.  Anything that mild isn't even cool,
unless it's high grade, and high ticket.
The show of money is always....well, "awesome,"
as the kids know, or think they do.
.
But murder and mayhem are possible anywhere.
Druggies, as we can all see now (if we didn't
 know this before watching the series)
 are neither dependable, nor predictable.
The cops are outnumbered and overwhelmed.
APD has serious manpower problems.
And the drugs just keep on rollin'.
.
The poison has spread cross the state, with no
regard for legal, historical, or cultural boundaries,
with no regard to "your place" in life,
or your job, if you have one,
or your future.
Albuquerque really is a sort of
 POSTER CHILD
for BREAKING BAD.
ALBUQUERQUE RULES!!!
.
.
I was born at St. Joe's Hospital,
 and have spent time in The Duke City off and on
over the years.  I went to college there with Tom Swisstack,
today the Mayor of Rio Rancho, that slice of
misguided Americana, with all the cookie-cutter houses,
 and those abominable New Yorkers who saw
 the Rio Rancho ads in The New York Times
 many years back. 
  And then she said:
"Morty, look at this!  And the prices are giveaway!
We could live like kings for the same amount
of money as we throw away here!
Morty, the air's clean and there's hardly
any blacks, just some injuns and messycans,
and they have pueblos and barrios and all that.
You could play golf nearly every day!
Morty, are you listening to me?
I hear you Maya, I'm listening....yeah....golf....
Zzzzzzz......"
.
.
But of course Rio Rancho has a lower crime rate
now than most areas of the state.
INTEL is there, and they have jobs, though large
numbers of their new employees are always
 from out-of-state.
They also USE A LOT OF WATER .
But there's no real economic security here.
INTEL'S facilities could be a ghost factory
five or ten years from now.
Things change.  Like markets.
Like the world.
Like Rio Rancho.
.
.
Naturally, the foreigners, via Michel Jichlinski,
have made a DIRECT effort to lure Rio Rancho
into their scheme.
Jichlinski made a special presentation to the
staff from the Rio Rancho Observer
last Spring.  The article
that resulted -
"PROJECT MAY MOVE WATER TO AREA"
 is interesting.
Jichlinski is as good a snake oil salesman
as you'd find preachin' off a wagon
anywhere in the West.
And there's a lot of 'em. 
 Always have been.
But we actually got the last word here.
And the last word is....read on:
http://www.rrobserver.com/news/local/article_9857bff2-a6d7-11e2-96e5-001a4bcf887a.html
.
.
.

Friday, August 9, 2013

DANCING FOR WATER & MORE LLC WEBSITE

.

.
Here's page 3 of the Augustin Plains Ranch LLC website.
We'll have commentary about this page and their entire site
after we have two interviews next week with experts in the field.
The idea of replacing all of the water pumped from
the aquifer with rainwater they collect at the ranch is still
the most blatant upfront falsehood in their presentation.
There's other problems with their hydrology, but we'll
hold our peace until the pros weigh in on these matters.
Patience.
If you'd like to see their entire presentation go to:
www.sanaugustinwater.com
We'll be picking apart their info and reasoning
over the next few weeks, once we get more interviews.
.
 

A Sustainable Project



Augustin Plains Ranch, located approximately 150 miles southwest of Albuquerque, sits atop a portion of an ancient lake that holds an estimated 50 million acre-feet of water (see page 117 of Appendix D of the Southwest New Mexico Regional Water Plan). This water is pure and meets federal drinking standards.
To help accommodate New Mexico’s growing need for water, the Augustin Plains Ranch proposes to develop an eco-friendly water reclamation and transport project that will pump 54,000 acre-feet of water out of the aquifer every year and pipe it to New Mexico communities. The design is exciting as it takes advantage of the ranch’s unique location to enhanced recharge and replace all of the pumped water with rain water and snowmelt currently being lost to evaporation. No water mining would occur.


This “green” project will also have a zero carbon footprint. A hydroelectric power plant at an elevation of 5,800 feet would produce 75% of the energy required to pump the water from the aquifer. The balance would be produced by solar energy as the Agustin Plains are one of the areas of New Mexico with the best potential for solar energy. Gravity flow would be used to convey the water from the hydroelectric plant to the Greater Albuquerque Metropolitan Area.
.
GRAVITY FLOW 
DOWN from the Plains to Socorro,
and then UP to Albuquerque.
It reminds me of a drawing by M.C. Escher.
.
.
The concept of a "siphon" is behind getting the
water to Rio Rancho, Albuquerque, and beyond. 
The water would go down to Socorro, in the Rio Grande
Valley and then hook a left and run up the valley to
Rio Rancho, for instance.  Because Rio Rancho (5200 ft) is
lower than the location of their proposed hydroelectric plant,
 (somewhere at 5800 ft., which would put it between Magdalena
and Socorro), the water will be able to "run uphill" theoretically,
once it leaves Socorro (4600 ft) to go north.
It's the old siphon idea.  With a few twists.
(We'll see what the experts tell us.)
.
.
Here's an excerpt from a book of essays about
New Mexico titled The River in Winter by
Stanley Crawford of Dixon, New Mexico. 
The essay: "DANCING FOR WATER" -
is insightful and holds a message for those interested
in the San Augustin aquifer issue, as well as anyone
interested in New Mexico's water.
.
"Everyone has been startled at least once by the
miraculous imagery of the saying that water can be made
to flow uphill toward money.  It is the genius of the image that
it seems to settle for a moment the arguments that bring it
into play.  Everything has its price.  We live in a world of
buying and selling.  What else can we say?
.
Yet we also live in a world of other kinds of value,
and sooner or later we will need to ask whether it is good
for anything but money for water to be made to flow uphill,
and whether it is bad for streams, rivers, traditions,
communities, and even individuals.
.
Some time ago I sat in on a water rights adjudication
hearing in Santa Fe - my first, so I was able to pretend to view
 it through somewhat innocent eyes.
There was the small, cramped courtroom in the old stone
Federal Courthouse, probably not unlike courtrooms and
hearing rooms where these proceedings have droned on in
New Mexico for hours and days and months and even years
and decades. 
.
.
 There were the twenty-five or thirty silent, patient
defendants from the far north village of Questa, who were
landowners, working men, probably miners or former miners,
Hispanic all, dressed in plaid western shirts and cowboy boots.
There were the attorneys and legal assistants for the New Mexico
State Engineer Office, four in all, Anglos all, with their table
 covered with huge aerial photographs, yellow legal pads,
clipboards of lists, notebooks.  There was the defendants' table,
presided over by a lone attorney from Northern New Mexico
Legal Services and a volunteer assistant from Questa.
There was a tripod from which hung detailed maps of the
section of Questa being debated, with parcels of land blocked
out in green and red and pink.  There was the imitation wood
paneled box of the witness stand where sat, during my time there,
a succession of Mr. Raels and Mr. Valdezes.  There was the
judge, a kindly black-suited gentleman who patiently elicited
and presided over a river of minutiae about fences and culverts
and walls and houses and ditches and pastures and the placement
of this or that boulder, all of which made up the
substance of the proceedings.
.
.
What I witnessed for a few hours was the operation of
that legal mechanism by which water is prepared for its
eventual pumping toward money.  It has to have its claim
of ownership documented, it has to have its title quieted, it has
to be made merchantable, salable, which is what enables it to be
freed up from land, acequia, community, and tradition.
A horrendously expensive process in itself, this
elaborate preparation, as anyone can easily estimate by
calculating the legal hours, the research time, surveying time,
driving time, lost work hours for the landowner defendants,
and so on, that must go into a hearing of this sort, which
in this case lasted well over a week.
And this was a minor one at that, concerning some
relatively small parcels of land that had been left out of
a previous adjudication suit.  And in the larger sense there
may never even be an end result.  The number of readjudication
 suits being opened up suggests that the process
 may well be perpetual.  And who pays?
In a state with a regressive tax structure, the expense of it all
will be disproportionately born by those most likely to
suffer from its effects.  And wherever there has been an end
result, it has been to pave the way toward the dissolution of
the traditional connection between land and water, and to
break down the fragile webbing that binds water to land and to
 acequia and to what may be called community itself in the
rural areas of northern New Mexico.  In short, the adjudication
 of water rights is social policy disguised as something else. 
.
Yet there was something dully reassuring about the hearing.
No sparrow that fell thirty years before would be overlooked
by the court, no garden grown by a grandmother or tenant or
neighbor or friend, within living memory.  But before my eyes
 began to glaze over and my own memory set about sorting
through other lists, the grand oddness of it all flashed through
my mind.  There was something missing.  Questa was here, in
this courtroom, but also most obviously, in the deepest sense,
Questa was still where it was, spread out over the sloping land
a hundred or so miles to the north, in the shadow of the
northernmost peaks of the Sangre de Cristo Range in
New Mexico.
.
.
  What we were looking at was a Questa that
had been evaporated out of its real setting to be reconstituted
here, in distilled form, on paper, in words spoken in the
courtroom - a Questa which had been driven through the
abstract filters of quantification and the law, depositing a
powdery residue of its real self in the courtroom.
The proper place for these hearings, I thought, should be
 in the very fields and orchards and gardens of the actual landscape,
 and they should be conducted while climbing fences, wandering
 down driveways, walking ditches, sitting on boulders, while
 eating and drinking, in the bright sun or the wind and the rain
and snow - not here, under flourescent lights, in air that has been
warmed too many times by the city's fevered lungs.
.
Water should go - we all know - to those who tend it, who use it,
who love it, who dance for it, and it should flow downhill from
stream to river, and river to sea.  Yet we have licensed our society
to scheme for it to flow toward those with power and money,
and we have turned over our public servants to them, we have
in effect given them the keys to the treasury so that no expense
will be spared in drawing lines, making maps, conducting research,
surveying boundaries, and filling vaults and basements
with mountains of legal testimony.
.
What is oddest of all - I thought as I regained an open sky
fretful with the sharp winds of a March afternoon - is that this
legalistic hairsplitting over water rights needs the long-term
ratification of the weather in order to work at all.  And the
weather, of course, is what no one can ever bring to court.
Being, I suppose you would say, above the law.  Capable, in
short, of rendering the vast social labor of adjudication
quite irrelevant - in these times of rapid climate change all
over the globe.  A kind of higher adjudication of the environment,
you might say, that could be trying to tell us that fooling
around with the elements is something we should think and
talk long and carefully about before anything else, and in
ways that make us all more neighborly, not less so."
.
.
.
 For centuries, Native Americans of the arid Southwest used a system of ponds and gravity-fed ditches (acequias) to grow crops with the little water they had. When the Spanish arrived in 1598, they were quick to adopt this system, establishing a unique tradition of irrigation and agriculture.
Below is a 26 minute program produced by KNME-TV (PBS)
Albuquerque, about the acequias in northern New Mexico,
narrated by Stanley Crawford, the author of the essay above.
It's very good - very New Mexico.
.
.
.