STOP THE WATER GRAB: frank titus

Showing posts with label frank titus. Show all posts

Sunday, June 23, 2013

WATER UPDATES - HOPE & LIES

The article below is from the KOAT (Albuquerque) website.

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. —As the village of Magdalena’s water shortage nears its second week, Albuquerque police and residents have decided to step up and help out.

The Albuquerque Police Department is asking residents to stop by the Prisoner Transport Center and drop off bottles of water, which have become the only source of cooking and drinking for so many in Magdalena.

There will be a mobile command unit available at the Coors Boulevard and Ellison Drive NW Walmart to take donations Thursday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. There will also be a donation site at the Walmart located at Wyoming Boulevard and Academy Road NE on Thursday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

“We just want to be a good neighbor here in New Mexico,” said Briane Dennison, APD Chaplain Commander. “Go down there and bless them with water… we’re looking to take two 25 ft. trailers full of donated water down to them.”

APD’s Operation Hope team also organized donations for Moore, Oklahoma after a tornado struck.

Using money from the Chaplain Unit Fund, APD has purchased two pallets of water. Since, Albuquerque residents have donated thousands of water bottles.

“It really shows the heart behind the badge,” said Dennison.

The deadline to drop off water donations is Friday at 8 a.m. If you’d like to donate money to the APD Chaplain Unit Fund, call 505-768-2131.

Below, Governor Susana Martinez talks about Magdalena's
water problems with a KOB reporter.

The new Augustin Plains Ranch LLC website, titled

"sanaugustinwater.com" - is a pathetic attempt to further

their PR campaign for the project. It's filled with nonsense,

and outright lies. Here's the photo and text

from their homepage:

The proposed Augustin Plains Ranch water pipeline project, much like the San Juan Chama River Project before it, has tremendous potential to supply New Mexico’s middle Rio Grande Valley with an abundance of water for centuries to come.
.
The demand for water in our state already surpasses its availability, and the situation is becoming even more dire due to extreme drought. That is why the project’s supporters and sponsors are committed to developing this much-needed resource on behalf of all New Mexicans. This state-of-the-art, eco-friendly project will be unique, producing its own power for operation through hydropower and solar energy. But more importantly, the project will create a new, sustainable and abundant source of water independent of compacts with other states.
.
This will be accomplished by replenishing a massive, underground aquifer in western New Mexico with rainwater that is currently lost to evaporation. The project will provide water to New Mexicans where it is needed most, and will also improve river habitat and water quality in the Rio Grande. With support from local, state, and federal agencies as well as New Mexico’s local communities, this project can begin delivering this desperately needed water within five years.

Well, golly. Here we are talking about the

Middle Rio Grande Valley, and we have a nice photo

of the Organ Mountains, FAR to the south of the Middle

Rio Grande Valley, down next to Las Cruces,
in the MESILLA VALLEY.

Here's a map of what is, for most political and historical

purposes and definitions, the Middle Rio Grande Valley,

published by the New Mexico Museum of Natural History.

Well, you can see what kind of ignorant fools we're

dealing with. They can't even illustrate their text correctly.

That picture is NOT from the area we're talking about.
It's about a hundred miles south.

"Well, it does't matter. Not in the slightest."

Oh yes it does, our little moron. Our little PR pimp.
This kind of BS is blatantly illegal.

It's misleading. It's bad advertising practice.
A photo is the product in action, one might say.
You're talkin' Middle Rio Grande Valley,
and showin' Mesilla Valley.
It's false advertising.
Someone needs to report you guys to the
Attorney General's Office. Maybe I will.
Misleading people on WATER right now ought
to be a hanging offense.
.
There might be a method to their madness.
They'll have that used-car salesman disguised as an attorney
from Las Cruces that serves in the State Legislature,
Joseph Cervantes, crawling into bed with them,
thinking he'll get some of the water moved south,
to Las Cruces and the Mesilla Valley.
That would be absolutely wonderful
for the gospel of "growth" that Cervantes
preaches in the public pulpits on behalf of the
"best interests" of southern New Mexico.
"Best interests" as defined by developers, agri-business,
bankers, hustlers, and ignorant politicians.
.
Oh, I see what's going on here now.
You guys are clever.
But you're still breaking the law.
Misrepresentation may be common at your office,
but it doesn't fly too well if you get caught.
.
Small-town PR flacks.

Ignorant. Amateurish. Fraudulent.

Must be that bunch over at The Waite Company at work.

It's amazing. You'd think the foreigners would get

someone worth a shit. Hell, they've got the money.
Or are they just too damned 'TIGHT' -
still have the first buck they ever made.
.
You know the type.

The Scotch and the Jews have both had to suffer

racial stereotyping because of this very trait

among some bad apples in their population -

the cheap ones, the slow-to-pay, the greedy,

no charity (except when it's public),

no soul.

Cash is the sole/soul denominator.

The worst. The pigs.

Anyhow, it's all as bland as can be and

loaded with misinformation. We'll take each

page and dissect it on the blog over time.

It's neat that I can just copy it, (and I have),

page by page, and we can all examine it, together,

and take a careful look at what they're

claiming - dissect the data.
.
They never put a copyright on the site.
It's unbelievably stupid. It's a commercial site.
I don't copyright because I want my material
spread to the four directions.
Not to copyright the company message seems strange at best,
or incredibly dim-witted on the other end.
What, was the company attorney on a bender?
Who are these dismal failures?
And who pays them?
The masters seem as stupid as the slaves,
and vice-versa.
Why does the San Augustin Plains water issue
draw such secretive,
fraudulent, worthless, un-American, anti-American,
shysters to the table?
Who also refuse to pay for a good PR outfit.
.
What's wrong with these people?
Too much good food and wine?
Too much EUROTRASH life?
(A cop told me that EUROTRASH is a new term
in law enforcement
for all the scam artists from EUROPA that
enter the American scene for operations of all types.
A new twist on white trash - this defines it geographically,
trash from the Old Country -
EUROTRASH.)

Anyway, here's an example of show-and-tell
with their site.

Para # 2 on their website homepage states:

The demand for water in our state already surpasses its availability, and the situation is becoming even more dire due to extreme drought. That is why the project’s supporters and sponsors are committed to developing this much-needed resource on behalf of all New Mexicans. This state-of-the-art, eco-friendly project will be unique, producing its own power for operation through hydropower and solar energy. But more importantly, the project will create a new, sustainable and abundant source of water independent of compacts with other states.

Eco-friendly? Nonsense.

Read our post about this point -

http://stopthewatergrab.blogspot.com/2013/03/greenwashing-san-augustin-project.html

The LLC has been on this "green" and "eco-friendly"

campaign as of the last six months or so - they keep

coming up with new sales ideas. This one's a lie.

Paragraph #3 states:

This will be accomplished by replenishing a massive, underground aquifer in western New Mexico with rainwater that is currently lost to evaporation. The project will provide water to New Mexicans where it is needed most, and will also improve river habitat and water quality in the Rio Grande. With support from local, state, and federal agencies as well as New Mexico’s local communities, this project can begin delivering this desperately needed water within five years.

.

.

.

Water

Water, water, water!

Water is essential for all life—
--plant, animal and human life.

Water is clear
Water is colourless
Water is tasteless
Water is transparent
Water pours on Earth as rain.

Water covers about 3/4of the Earth's surface
Water bodies are ocean, sea, lake, river
Water can be had from wells by digging the Earth
Water naturally occurs as mineral water as at spa.

Water is in liquid form
Water is in solid form (ice)
Water is in gaseous form (water vapour)
Water is as snow and snowflakes.

Water is secreted from the body-
-as urine, tears, perspiration, and saliva.

Water is a chemical compound
Water is composed of two elements
Water molecule contains—
-one oxygen and two hydrogen atoms.
Water boils at 212 degrees F or 100 degrees C
Water freezes at 32 degrees F o 0 degrees C.

Water, water, water!

chandra thiagarajan

.

.

I'll get back to this when I have time.

Right now I need to water the roses and sunflowers

with Hop Canyon aqua.

Thanks to Tom and Brandon!

.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

THE RIO GRANDE

The Rio Grande and the aquifer lying beneath the

San Augustin Plains are connected. There's more about

that further below, but first we'd like to start with

some history.

The Mission de Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe
in Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico,
(above - the little mission on the left)
and the settlers who clustered around it,
comprised the first European settlement on the river,
and in the region, founded in 1659.
It was then known as

"Paso del Norte" - Pass of the North,

and early on became a trading center

and economic hub of the region.

Oh, and the subject of songs too.

From

GREAT RIVER -

The Rio Grande in North American History

Winner of the Pulitzer Prize in History (1954)

by Paul Horgan

"In its length of nearly two thousand miles and its
cultural evidence encompassing ten centuries and more,
the Great River remains the unifying vein of history not only
of the life adjacent to its banks, but also of the greater
Southwest. There, if often far afield, the political, social,
and geographical significance of the river can be traced
through the times of five sovereignties - those of the Indian,
Spain, Mexico, Texas, and the United States.

In manners of living, a long, slow sequence unfolded for
the early river peoples. Prehistoric intuitions among them
gradually gave way to knacks and simple ingenuities -

primitive technologies to do with water, fire, agriculture,
shelter, travel, weaponry. For centuries all these were
developed without that sense of shock that accelerated rates of

discovery produce. But with the waves of activity and means
of control of the natural world that rose with the industrial
revolution and the migratory imperatives of the nineteenth
century, man's impact on the environment brought swift and
radical change within a single human lifetime."

"Into the Rio Grande country, ranging through the area
of what became three immense modern states and touching
the great length of the river's immediate course, came
railroads, electricity, exploitation of mineral resources,
colonization, urbanization at key points, and - not to be
undervalued - the popular discovery of the natural aesthetic
of generally benign climate over a landscape of most
desirable beauty."

"In modern days, therefore, population not only changed in

character, it grew in a few generations to a size that threatened

to create a dangerous imbalance between what was available

to sustain life and what was demanded by headlong social

increase. The problem was not exclusive to the Southwest,

it plagued the nation and, indeed, with Latin America included,

it invaded the hemisphere.

But it was in the Southwest that technological change

became most rapidly visible. The desert country, having

sustained sufficiently the modest requirements of the Indians,

the Spaniard, and the Mexican, now had to meet the

environmental levies of the United States genius for industry.

Added to these were a foreshortened vision of the good life,

which the American citizen and his suppliers made commonly

necessary without much common foresight for the future

effects of the technological society on such matters as pollution

of air, earth, and water, and - most significant for the

Southwest - dangerous depletion of the very sources

of water itself."

"The Rio Grande, long an adequate though never a

voluminous river except in flood tide, has been attended

in modern times by concerned management in its government

conservancy districts; but in many places the river has become

only a trickle, and in others entirely dry, to be replenished

only by flood from otherwise dry or meager local tributaries

and by diminishing groundwater, this always in the face of

increasing needs of its resources in both the United States

and Mexico."

Drought Fuels Water War Between

Texas and New Mexico

by Sandra Postel - Jaunuary 18, 2013

As climate change alters rainfall patterns and river flows, tensions are bound to rise between states and countries that share rivers that cross their borders.

In the Rio Grande Basin of the American Southwest, that future inevitability has arrived.

Last week Texas, suffering through a devastating drought, filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court alleging that New Mexico is failing to live up to its water delivery commitments under the 1938 Rio Grande Compact.

The Rio Grande rises in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado and flows 1,900 miles before entering the Gulf of Mexico.

Texas charges that New Mexico’s pumping of groundwater in the region below Elephant Butte Dam to the New Mexico-Texas border is reducing Rio Grande flows into Texas, thereby depriving the state’s farms and cities of water they are legally entitled to under the Compact.

Texas v. New Mexico is likely to be but one of a string of disputes that erupt as drought causes water supplies to dwindle and water-sharing pacts devised in wetter and less-populated times can no longer hold the peace.

Texas doesn’t specify how much water it believes New Mexico is illegally withholding, but indicates it is sufficient to irrigate thousands of acres of farmland. The city of El Paso also relies on Rio Grande water for half of its supply.

New Mexico officials have consistently maintained that the state is sending to Texas all the Rio Grande water to which it is legally entitled. The state attorney general said in a recent statement that Texas is “trying to rustle New Mexico’s water and using a lawsuit to extort an agreement that would only benefit Texas while destroying water resources for hundreds of thousands of New Mexicans.”

Fighting words, to be sure.

If the Supreme Court justices decide to take up the case, they would do well to first sign up for hydrology 101.

One of the great water myths is that rivers and underground aquifers are separate and distinct sources of water. In reality, rivers and groundwater are often intimately connected.

Groundwater provides the “base” flow that keeps many rivers running during dry times. For their part, rivers and irrigation canals leak water into the subsurface, recharging the aquifers below.

In dry years, when surface supplies run low, farmers often turn to underground water to replace or supplement their irrigation supply. That’s what New Mexico farmers downstream of Elephant Butte have done during years of drought and low river flows.

In the Mesilla Basin, for example, groundwater is the primary source of irrigation water for about 5,000 acres, but is a supplemental source of supply for more than 70,000 acres. So in dry times, groundwater withdrawals ratchet up.

According to an article on the impacts of groundwater pumping in the Rio Grande Basin published in this month’s Ecosphere, a journal of the Ecological Society of America, during the 2004 drought, when federal officials curtailed releases from Elephant Butte Dam, pumping from the Messila Aquifer rose to twice the long-term average.

The drought of recent years has elicited a similar response from farmers, and groundwater pumping in the Rio Grande Valley has increased markedly. But how much this pumping has affected flows into Texas is in question.

The current bi-state conflict began in 2007 when Texas farmers complained that New Mexico was extracting too much groundwater. To avoid an escalating legal fight, the federal Bureau of Reclamation, which operates Elephant Butte, worked out an agreement with two irrigation districts in Texas and New Mexico to give Texas more river water to make up for New Mexico’s groundwater use.

That agreement didn’t sit well with New Mexico officials, however, and three years later the state filed suit against the Bureau, charging that the deal gave away too much of New Mexico’s Rio Grande allotment to Texas and would cause $183 million in damages to the state’s agricultural economy.

Texas shot back with the lawsuit filed last week.

Meanwhile, the drought persists. Elephant Butte is at 8 percent of its storage capacity, the same as when I visited the reservoir last August.
.

While the legal case may drag on for years, it is a wake-up call for all states and nations that share transboundary waters to proactively add resilience to their treaties and institutions before crises hit, and even more importantly, to develop workable governing structures over water where they are lacking.

It is also a lesson to invest now in water efficiency improvements so as to reduce pressures on both rivers and aquifers.

Because while the Supreme Court may ultimately decide this Texas-sized water dispute, even the highest court in the land can’t dictate Mother Nature to deliver more water.

Sandra Postel is director of the Global Water Policy Project and Freshwater Fellow of the National Geographic Society. She is the author of several acclaimed books, including the award-winning Last Oasis, a Pew Scholar in Conservation and the Environment, and one of the “Scientific American 50.”

Below is a "Comment" to the article from

Dr. William Turner of Albuquerque,

a water broker.
.

Albuquerque, New Mexico

January 21

Some New Mexico State Engineers have had a screw Texas point of view which is now coming home to roost. For example, in 1972, Charles Crowder, a land developer and visionary, acquired 22,000 acres of land in the area of Santa Theresa. It was his long term vision to build a major metropolitan community and he needed water. So, Mr. Crowder had a meeting with long time State Engineer Steve Reynolds. Mr. Crowder asked Mr. Reynolds if he needed to file applications with the State Engineer Office for the 36 water wells

he planned.

.
Reynolds replied: “Hell no Charley.
Drill all the wells you want.
We want to get that water before it gets to Texas.”
His mismanagement of the Pecos River resulted in the failure
of New Mexico to deliver water to Texas on the Pecos River.
The Supreme Court required New Mexico to bring their
deliveries into accord with the Pecos River Compact.
His mismanagement cost New New Mexico taxpayers more
than $100 million to retire private water rights
to satisfy the judgement.

To see all the comments go here:
http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/18/drought-fuels-water-war-between-texas-and-new-mexico/

The YouTube piece below is basically a music video

of birds in the Middle Rio Grande Valley set to the music of

Composer/Performer Paul Schwartz.

The following is from a Middle Rio Grande Conservancy
District office report concerning the testimony of hydrologist
Dr. Frank Titus, after he testified before them as an
expert witness, in January of 2008. The full report is
available on the San Augustin Water Coalition website.
It should be noted that since 2008 the LLC has modified
and enlarged on the original plan that was publicized -
which had the water being piped to Socorro and then put in
the Rio Grande at that point. Now they talk about piping it to
Rio Rancho, or perhaps even Santa Fe. This is also before
their new "idea" that they can catch enough rain to
recharge the aquifer - a ludicrous proposal, at best.
.
Bruce Frederick, the New Mexico Environmental Law Center
attorney that represents many, many parties objecting
to the Water Grab, has done the math on that one.
It should be noted that this gentleman isn't just a lawyer,
he also has a Masters Degree in Groundwater Hydrology
from New Mexico Tech.
.

.
Here's what he told the Rio Rancho Observer:
“I think it’s an absurd notion on the face of it,” said New Mexico
Environmental Law Center attorney Bruce Frederick of the
proposal of pumping 54,000 acre-feet a year and replacing it
with rain water.
Frederick has opposed the company’s attempt
to get a pumping permit.
To meet the company’s goal, he said each acre
in the proposed project area would have to produce
12 acre-feet, or 3.9 million gallons, of water each year."
.
.Well, unless the same kind of storms that came at Noah's time
are in the forecast, 144 inches of rain per year is
simply NOT in the cards. Are these people really, really
that stupid - or do they take us all for fools? Or both?
Anyhow, here's the report about Dr. Titus's testimony.
.
Dr. Titus said that this proposal to bring 54,000 acre ft. of water per year out of the San Augustin Basin over to the Rio Grande, in his book, is imaginative and if it goes that way that it will be very profitable for somebody. But it will also screw a bunch of people. By his calculations, the 37 proposed wells to provide the water are laid out in an array covering about 14 sections in the vicinity of Datil and running from just south of US Hwy 60 north for about 6-7 miles. If these wells produce 54,000 ac-ft of water per year, and if they create a cone of depression that is twice the area of the footprint of the wells, they will create draw down of 30 feet a year and that is if they have the capacity to produce that much water at all. The proposition that 37 wells can provide that much water assumes that the wells in an aquifer that is as prolific as the aquifer in the vicinity of Albuquerque and this is a unique, marvelous aquifer. The proposition that 37 wells can be drilled in the northeastern part of the San Augustin Plains and produce 2,000-3,000 gallons per minutes is at least highly questionable. At 30 feet of draw down per year they could not produce for very long. The wells are in a highly prolific part of the aquifer, but in order to produce for many decades at that rate they would have to cover the whole basin with wells and have dramatic draw downs over the basin and most of the rest of the basin does not have the permeability
that that particular part does.
.
If the State Engineer approve such a proposal, the most distressing part is that which is the good aquifer end of the San Augustin Plains it probably also discharges a significant amount of water down Alamosa Creek and ultimately through the box that is about 15 miles down stream and over to the west side of Elephant Butte Reservoir. There is no quantitative data to know how much water is involved coming down the pathway. A proposal to bring 54,000 ac-ft per year and put it in the river in the Socorro vicinity and thereby balance an equal amount of pumping out of the Albuquerque/Rio Rancho area does several things. First of all it would measurably reduce the flow of the Rio Grande surface water system including through the District’s distribution system. Markedly reduce the flow between Albuquerque and the point at which water is put into the Rio Grande Valley in the Socorro area - that is an 80 mile stretch. There is an inevitable reduction in wet water flow. There is the issue of the contribution from Monticello Creek, Alamosa Creek coming out of the San Augustin Basin to the west side of Elephant Butte Reservoir. Assuming that the addition at Socorro matches the withdrawal at Albuquerque at least there would be a balance in that reach. But when you go on down stream, it is inevitable that if you take water our of the San Augustin Basin and you pipe it to Socorro, then you cut off the flow down Alamosa Creek and Monticello Creek into Elephant Butte. Ultimately, even though it may take decades to happen, the total flow of the Rio Grande will be reduced by the amount of water that is taken out of the San Augustin Basin.

.
Then there is the problem of the closed basin character of the San Augustin Basin and it’s an issue of how long it is able to continue to contribute that water to the Socorro reach assuming a pipeline is built and water is piped. Over a period of decades the water table will be drawn down so much in the San Augustin region that it will no longer supply fresh water. Once all of the easily available water out of the San Augustin Basin is exploited and no longer able to contribute water to the Rio Grande, then there is no replacement water coming in. If this is approved, we will have created an additional cone of depression and removed water from the Albuquerque area which cannot be replaced now and there will be no more water coming into the Socorro area because the San Augustin region will be exhausted and we will cut off the source of water going down to recharge the system at Elephant Butte. By short sighted approval of such a proposition, we will be put in a position where there is simply no way to balance the amount of water that has been taken out and we will come up seriously short. Of course, it will not be within the tenure of this State Engineer or several others, but the State of New Mexico is going to be around for a long time as well as the MRGCD. Dr. Titus said that in his personal opinion that for the District to participate in any way in this kind of a thing - it’s basically a
money making scam by someone that
owns a ranch over there.
.

STOP THE WATER GRAB!

"A river seems a magic thing.

A magic, moving, living part

of the very earth itself."

Laura Gilpin

."The Rio Grande Yields Its Surplus To The Sea"

Laura Gilpin

1948

Translate

Sunday, June 23, 2013

WATER UPDATES - HOPE & LIES

APD seeks water donations for Magdalena

Thousands of water bottles donated thus far

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

THE RIO GRANDE